Outcomes of Toric IOL Implantation in Keratoconus Patients Using Intraoperative Aberrometer System

Monday, April 28, 2014: 8:51 AM
Room 151B (Boston Convention and Exhibition Center)
Darcy H. Wolsey, MD, MPH, The Eye Institute of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
David J. Felsted, BS Peoria, AZ, USA
Robert J. Cionni, MD, The Eye Institute of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Narrative Responses:

Purpose
To evaluate the use and effectiveness of intraoperative aberrometry in patients with keratoconus undergoing cataract surgery with a toric intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods
Charts were reviewed of patients with the diagnosis of keratoconus who underwent cataract surgery with toric intraocular lenses implanted using intraoperative aberrometry guidance between the years of Jan 2012 and July 2013.  Uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity (UCVA, BCVA), and manifest refraction (Mrx) were compared pre and postoperatively.  Surgical data including results of aberrometry, changes in IOL spherical and toric power and position of toric IOL were evaluated.

Results
26 eyes from 16 patients with keratoconus were reviewed. Average preoperative sphere was -5.75 diopters (D) (range 0--14.0) and cylinder was 3.3 D (range 1-7). Postoperatively, 92% saw 20/40 UCVA. Average sphere and cylinder was -0.30 D and 0.52 D. Aberrometry recommended changes in IOL spherical power in 17 eyes but only 3 were changed. 14 eyes would be more hyperopic if IOL power were changed based on aberrometry. Toric power was changed in 12 eyes based on aberrometry. 11/12 had 0.50 D or less of residual cylinder.  In 12 eyes, the IOL was rotated based on intraoperative readings.

Conclusion
The use of toric IOLs and intraoperative aberrometry is not approved for eyes with irregular astigmatism. Excellent visual results can be obtained in appropriately selected keratoconic patients. Intraoperative aberrometry may lead to more hyperopic results, but can be useful in determining overall toric power and position.