Primary Posterior Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis Combined With Diffractive Multifocal IOL Implantation
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of mild posterior capsule opacity (PCO) on visual acuity (VA) in eyes implanted with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) compared with a monofocal IOL, and the effect of posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) combined with diffractive multifocal IOL implantation.
Methods
For the initial evaluation, we compared charge-coupled device (CCD) camera photographs taken through both a monofocal IOL-loaded model eye and a diffractive IOL-loaded model eye under the conditions of both with and without an opaque filter for the simulation of mild PCO. The clinical evaluation involved 20 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of the same diffractive multifocal IOL. In all 20 cases, PCCC was performed in 1 eye (PCCC group) and not performed in the fellow eye (NCCC group). Postoperative clinical results were then compared between the two groups.
Results
The CCD photographs revealed that the diffractive IOL-loaded eye was more strongly affected by the simulated PCO than was the monofocal IOL-loaded eye. In the clinical setting, the PCCC group registered better results in distance and near VA, low-contrast VA, and contrast sensitivity testing with significant difference at 1-day and 1-month post-operative.
Conclusion
Diffractive multifocal IOLs tend to be more influenced by mild PCO than do monofocal IOLs, and PCCC prior to IOL implantation can contribute to the avoidance of this effect in the early postoperative period.